Most comparison tools quote one rate no matter the size of your transfer — the best price available for a tiny trade. This tool walks the real bid-side orderbook on supporting crypto exchanges at $200, $1,000, and $5,000 notionals, showing the rate a transfer of your actual size would execute at, slippage included.
Select your corridor and an approximate transfer size.
The tool shows the measured rate at each available depth band ($200, $1,000, $5,000) for providers that support orderbook-level data collection.
It flags how much of each band the available liquidity could fill, and computes a slippage figure between the best and worst available bands.
During each scrape run, the pipeline walks the real bid-side orderbook on supporting crypto exchanges at $200, $1,000, and $5,000 notionals, so the displayed rate reflects what a trade of that actual size would execute at — including slippage from consuming multiple price levels — rather than a single best-price quote.
Depth data is only shown where the exchange supports orderbook-level collection and has at least two measured size bands of liquidity. Traditional providers (banks, Wise, etc.) don't expose orderbook depth, so they always display as flat quotes; when a crypto provider lacks sufficient depth data, it also falls back to a flat quote rather than a fabricated band.
"% filled" means the orderbook had enough liquidity to complete that entire notional at the displayed rate; a figure below 100% means liquidity ran out partway through that band, so actual execution at that size would be worse than shown.
The depth verdict compares the effective rate at the lowest available band against the highest available band: slippage% = (lowestBandRate − highestBandRate) / lowestBandRate × 100. Slippage of 0.05% or less is reported as "minimal price impact"; otherwise the fill percentage and slippage at the largest band are reported directly, using only the bands actually returned — nothing is interpolated.
Worked example: Sending $1,000 from USD to MXN, the cheapest measured route today is Xoom at 0.95% better than the mid-market rate (a measured premium, not a cost) — about $9.50 more than a mid-market transfer on $1,000, as of July 20, 2026. Rates are refreshed every 6 hours from live provider data.
Most comparison tools quote a single rate regardless of amount — the best available price for a tiny trade. We instead walk the real bid-side orderbook on supporting crypto exchanges at $200, $1,000, and $5,000 notionals during each scrape run, so the rate shown reflects what a trade of that actual size would execute at, including any slippage from consuming multiple price levels.
Depth data is only available where the exchange supports orderbook-level data collection and has at least two size bands of measured liquidity. Traditional providers (banks, Wise, etc.) don't expose orderbook depth at all, so they always show as flat quotes. When a crypto provider lacks sufficient depth data, we show its flat quote too rather than fabricating bands.
100% filled means the orderbook had enough liquidity to complete that entire notional at the displayed rate. A figure below 100% means liquidity ran out partway through that band — actual execution at that size would be worse than the rate shown, because the remaining amount would fill at a less favorable price.
We compare the effective rate at the lowest available band against the highest available band for that provider: slippage% = (lowestBandRate − highestBandRate) / lowestBandRate × 100. If that slippage is 0.05% or less, we call it "minimal price impact"; otherwise we report the fill percentage and slippage at the largest band directly, using only the bands actually returned — nothing is interpolated between them.
Compare live rates across 370+ corridors on RemitRoutes · methodology.