Bangladesh's Record Year: December 2025 Remittances Surge 22% as Hundi Loses Ground

In December 2025, remittances to Bangladesh reached $3.22 billion — up a striking 22.35% year over year and the second-highest monthly inflow in the country's history, per Bangladesh Bank data reported by The Business Standard and The Financial Express. December's surge sealed a record calendar year: 2025 inflows totalled roughly $32.8 billion, an all-time high that materially shored up the country's foreign exchange reserves.

2025 was the first year Bangladesh crossed $3 billion in a single month twice — in March and again in December. Behind the record sits a structural story as important as the headline: a sustained shift of flows from hundi (the informal hawala-style network that historically carried a large share of Bangladeshi remittances) into formal banking channels, driven by exchange-rate reforms and a crackdown on informal operators.

+22.35% — Year-over-year growth in remittances to Bangladesh in December 2025 — $3.22 billion, the second-highest month on record (Bangladesh Bank) (Bangladesh Bank / The Business Standard, reporting December 2025 data)

How Bangladesh Broke Its Record

The proximate driver was the taka. After years of a managed exchange rate that penalised formal-channel senders — official rates paid noticeably fewer taka per dollar than the kerb market, pushing volume to hundi — Bangladesh's move toward market-based exchange rates narrowed that gap. When banks pay close to the real rate, the informal network's price advantage evaporates, and measured remittances jump even if total money sent barely changes.

The Business Standard's reporting through 2025 tracked this substitution explicitly: record formal inflows "as hundi dominance declines." Bank-level December data shows the formal system absorbing the volume — Islami Bank Bangladesh led private banks with $671 million collected in the month, with state-owned Janata Bank at $281 million.

The sending-side base also remained strong: Gulf states — Saudi Arabia and the UAE above all — employ millions of Bangladeshi workers, and steady GCC labour demand through 2025 mirrored the pattern seen in Pakistan's record flows the same year. South Asia's two record-setters (Bangladesh and Pakistan) and the Philippines' all-time high stand in sharp contrast to Mexico's 4.6% decline — 2025 was a year of divergence, not a uniform remittance boom.

Formalisation Is a Cost Story

Bangladesh's record is fundamentally about the price of sending money. Hundi thrived because formal channels were expensive in disguise — not through fees, but through an artificially unfavourable exchange rate. The lesson generalises: senders reliably route around bad pricing, whether the alternative is an informal network or a crypto rail. When formal channels price honestly, volume follows.

The same dynamic plays out in RemitRoutes' measured data across South Asian corridors. Providers with tight FX spreads win recipients more local currency; wide-spread providers lose share. The World Bank put the global average remittance cost at 6.36% in Q3 2025 — South Asia is cheaper than average, but the spread between best and worst channels on any given corridor remains the sender's biggest lever.

What RemitRoutes' Measured Data Shows Today: AED → INR, 1,000 AED (as of July 2026)

ProviderTypeAll-in vs mid-marketRecipient gets (INR)
Coinbase (crypto rail)Crypto+4.93% above mid-market27,253
CoinDCX (crypto rail)Crypto+3.49% above mid-market26,880
RemitlyTraditional−0.57%25,825
WiseTraditional−0.71%25,789

What It Means for Senders

For Bangladeshis abroad, the practical news from 2025's record is that formal channels finally compete on price. Bank transfers and licensed MTOs now deliver taka at close to the real market rate, plus the government's cash incentive on formal remittances — a combination hundi cannot legally match, with none of hundi's counterparty risk.

For everyone else, Bangladesh's year is a case study in why FX markup — not the advertised fee — decides what your family receives. A "zero-fee" transfer at a rate 3% below mid-market costs more than a $10 fee at the real rate on any amount over $333. Compare the amount your recipient actually gets, on every corridor, before every transfer.

Compare live rates across 360+ corridors on RemitRoutes · methodology.